Talk:Friedrichshafen FF.19/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 19:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 19:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

• Is there a retirement year to add to the infobox?
  • None that I've been able to find. I suspect sometime in 1915 based on the small numbers built.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Body

• Lowercase "Operational history" in the header
• Is there a date/year the aircraft was retired?
• Rest looks good

Sources

• All sources look reliable

Images

• Uses fair use, but I found the same image on Flickr which could be uploaded to replace the free use image. This similar image of the same aircraft was confirmed by a Commons administrator which was uploaded from the same Flickr account, the San Diego Air and Space Museum Archive.
  • Thanks for that; I'd searched Google images without success for a copyright-free image, but it didn't turn up this one. I'll have to bookmark the SDSM for later use.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Other

• Focused on topic
• Neutral
• Stable
• Good coverage for the information available

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@Sturmvogel 66: I've done my review of the article and left some comments. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 20:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

@PizzaKing13: All done. Thanks for taking this on.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: Everything looks good. I'll pass this review. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 07:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.