Talk:Friedrich Hecker

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Friedrich Hecker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany C‑class Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / European / German / North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

POV explanation

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These are not neutral phrases:

"attempted to extort"
"impracticable provisions"
"was not at all ready to listen"

There are others as well. LaurentianShield (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Probable source

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Update on the above: most if not all of the non-neutral language comes from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. See for example:

Encyclopedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, Vol. XIII: Harmony to Hurstmonceaux. New York: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 1911. p. 194.

So I do not anticipate any dispute from modern Wikipedians. However, I believe we may need a little time for commentary. Also, I am not shirking my responsibility to clean it up myself, but it takes some work and there are a few other higher priorities for me right now. LaurentianShield (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Really just one section, so focused the POV tag on that. The rest of the article is just disorganized. Also there is a broken Wikisource link. All of these things add together and amplify the lack of neutrality on one section, but can be addressed one at a time. LaurentianShield (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Friedrich Hecker/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It seems to cover everything. The text needs to be connected with the references using citations. An infobox is needed. It is well illustrated. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 17:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 15:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Heckerlied

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I came to this article from a non-Wikipedia mention of the song. It is barely mentioned in “Postwar activities and reputation” paragraph, but perhaps information from the German Wiki there cited should be adapted and given here (and in the Hecker uprising article). A job for someone with better German than me?

Dan Milton 173.79.209.155 (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic