Talk:Fridtjof Nansen-class frigate

Norway Loves Aegis

June 7, 2007: The second of five Norwegian Nansen class frigates, the Roald Amundsen, has completed its sea trials and entered service. The 5,200 ton Nansen class ships are being built in Spain and cost $600 million each. The 433 foot long Nansens have a top speed of 48 kilometers an hour. Weapons include eight NSM anti-ship missiles, 32 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile anti-aircraft missiles (in an eight cell launcher), one 76mm gun, four 12.7mm machine-guns, four torpedo tubes, depth charges and one helicopter. The highly automated ships have radar, sonar, electronic countermeasures and a crew of 130. These ships are equipped with American Aegis radar systems, and their design is based on the he Spanish Alvaro de Bazán class Aegis ships. The U.S. guards it Aegis radar technology closely, and only five navies have ships using this AESA type radar and its powerful software.

The last three of the Nansens will enter service in three years. There have been some complaints about poor quality control in the Spanish shipyards. Then again, the Spanish yards were the low bidder, and the Norwegian and German yards that lost out, have not forgotten, nor have their supporters in Norway. Meanwhile, the Norwegians like the idea of having such a powerful anti-aircraft ship to deal with any mischief the Russians might be up to in the future. http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htsurf/articles/20070607.aspx

A few weeks ago a Norwegian newspaper (Bergens Tidende), in a series about the new frigates, made a request to Lockheed Martin about missile defense capabilites (ballistic missiles), and the answer from Kenneth B. Ross, LM, was that they only needed a software upgrade to be able to perform missile defence, and that they can share target information with US Aegis vessels, and launche missiles based on target data from another Aegis vessel (obviously, the frigates will also need more VLS cells and longer range SAMs, but LM was referring to the radar). Norwegian armed forces has requested a report about this from the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, but this report is classified. Bjørn Egenberg, the frigate chief in the RNoN, confirms that the frigates will be well suited to take part in such a mission. Here is the article, but it is in Norwegian BT.no. Same story from the largest newspaper in Norway VG

Incidentally, I am an engineer working in Navantia. We haven´t noticed here the complains about the "poor quality controls in our shipyards". Are we facing another attempt to debase our prestige from our loved anglo-saxon competitors and judges? Of course. This is not the first time, and unfortunately it won´t be the last one. They will never fotget that we built and exported a VSTOL carrier (Príncipe de Asturias class) that overtakes in everything the Invincible class. Sorry mates, but the experts are the ones who decide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.122.166.17 (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Additional radar for the frigates, new extreme short range mode demonstrated, Loki torpedo decoy

According to this link another radar will support helicopter operations, can detect air and surface targets according to link. And a new extreme short range mode demonstrated according to this link

Link describing the new radar here, I have added the radar in the article.

The torpedo decoy is Loki, as seen here—Preceding unsigned comment added by Orcaborealis (talk • contribs) 00:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Spare Mk41 VLSs

Anyone know the correct amount of spare Mk41's the ship can be fitted with? I read here that it is prepared for just 1 extra, but a previous edit of the wikipedia article stated 3 spares. VaiNe (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Commissioned

Otto Sverdrup has been taken over by the Norwegian naval forces, however it has not yet entered service. It is currently undergoing tests and preparations. ZorroIII (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fridtjof Nansen-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203153628/http://www.mil.no:80/fregatter/start/fakta/ to http://www.mil.no/fregatter/start/fakta/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Something strikingly bad about this article about the frigates

Something strikingly bad about this article about the frigates.
There are many sentences about what "will be" about these five ships, and when they "will be" commissioned, etc.
As I write this, it is now mid-December 2016, and two of these frigates were commissioned over 10 years ago.
Furthermore, all five of them are now fully commissioned and in service. Someone from Norway needs to expend the effort to update this article to recent years, including improvements and upgrades that have already been executed years ago.
Furthermore, very little is said about the missile armament of these frigates. These are AEGIS ships, but apparently they do not have something that is crucial to that system, the RIM-66 Standard SM-2MR, which arms the AEGIS ships of the United States, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and so forth. Some paragraphs of explanation are needed.08:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.215.211.115 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fridtjof Nansen-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301041456/http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/article.jhtml?articleID=174044 to http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/article.jhtml?articleID=174044
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090801221614/http://www.mil.no/start/article.jhtml?articleID=187690 to http://www.mil.no/start/article.jhtml?articleID=187690
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930221055/http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/article.jhtml?articleID=142767 to http://www.mil.no/sjo/start/article.jhtml?articleID=142767
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327043212/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/ms2/Radar_Sense_Fall07_Spread.pdf to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/ms2/Radar_Sense_Fall07_Spread.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.defpro.com/news/details/18513/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fridtjof Nansen-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080502190111/http://www.mil.no/start/aktuelt/article.jhtml?articleID=160981 to http://www.mil.no/start/aktuelt/article.jhtml?articleID=160981

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)