Talk:Friday Night Is Music Night
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Tbhotch in topic Requested move 07 October 2016
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editI'm baffled by the spelling of "is" in this article's title. MOS:CT unambiguously states that all verb forms ought to be capitalised, so the article should be named Friday Night Is Music Night, which unsurprisingly is also the BBC's spelling. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 07 October 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Uncontested uncontroversial move. (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 08:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Friday Night is Music Night → Friday Night Is Music Night – I can't see any reason not to capitalise a verb in a title. That's also the spelling used by the broadcaster, the BBC. – Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Michael Bednarek and Nyuszika7H: You are right according to MOS:CT, it should be capitalized, but I'd just like to note that "official" spelling doesn't really count, per WP:OFFICIALNAME and precedent at "Love Me like You Do" (though personally I don't like the way that looks). – nyuszika7h (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Nyuszika7H and Anthony Appleyard: Is that an objection or a support for this request? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Michael Bednarek and Nyuszika7H: I am neutral here; this is a move request which was submitted as uncontroversial, but someone queried it, so better get it discussed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: I wasn't contesting it, I was supporting it, just added a side note for future reference which is irrelevant in this case as there was another reason to have the page moved other than it being the official stylization, MOS:CT also supports this. nyuszika7h (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.