Talk:French ironclad Magenta (1890)/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
edit1. Prose ✓ Pass
2. Verifiability ✓ Pass
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass
Comments
edit1.
- "They introduced the lozenge arrangement for their main battery" - Since this is talking about the class overall, I think it should be singular.
- Changed "They" to "The ships"
- Infobox gives two compound steam engines, text gives four. Which is correct?
- Fixed
- Maybe consider rephrasing "the French began rebuilding" as "The French navy began rebuilding"
- Done
- Infobox gives fate as scrapped, prose gives fate as "unknown".
- Fixed
2.
- Namesake needs a citation
- Removed, as I don't have a citation
- Deck armor needs a citation
- Added a line to the design section
3.
4.
5.
6.
- Is the PD-US tag on file:Marceua line drawing.png appropriate since the book it's from appears to have been published in the UK not the US? I'm not an expert at file tagging.
- It should have been {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}
7.
- Any idea why sources are so conflicting on the armament? If so, it might be worth mentioning as a note.
Placing on hold, just a few issues - a couple prose issues, two inconsistencies, and a couple citations needed. Hog Farm (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Hog Farm. Parsecboy (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Passing Hog Farm (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)