Talk:French destroyer Panthère
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
 | French destroyer Panthère has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 29, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Panthère/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Two dupe links
- The italicized numbers in the gun names look funny to me.
- "She was laid down...a month later" - that's a rather long sentence with a number of sub-clauses - might be worth splitting at "...vacated by her sister ship Jaguar. She was launched..."
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Good idea to split the long sentence. Those are the full names of the guns and should be completely italicized even if the 130 mm is the exact same as English. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! Thanks for reviewing this in between present wrapping, etc. Funny how just playing with the paper would likely delight your youngest just fine, but traditions must be observed... Merry Christmas.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)