Talk:French destroyer Épée (1938)/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • only days before the French signed an armistice with the Germans Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
  • to counter the large destroyers of the Italian Navigatori and Japanese Fubuki classes Pipe Italian and Japanese with the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan.
  • steam provided by four Sural-Penhöet forced-circulation boilers Link Sural-Penhöet.
  • Their anti-aircraft armament consisted Add "(AA)".
  • In addition a pair of single mounts for Browning 13.2-millimeter Replace "In addition" with "besides".
    • No, that doesn't work.
  • No edit wars.

Infobox

  • Looks okay to me.

Images

  • Is there a link to the source of File:Hardi-2.jpg?
    • Added.

Sources

  • "French Destroyers: Torpilleurs d'Escadre and Contre-Torpilleurs,1922-1956" needs a Google Books URL.
    • No it doesn't. And there's a bot running around that does it anyway
  • Google Books claims that the title of Whitley is "Destroyers of World War Two: An International Encyclopedia" Could you confirm whether it is right or not?
  • Wait for a second. There are two "Destroyers of World War Two" both from Whitley?
    • Nah, just an incomplete copy-paste job from another article.

That's it I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

See if my changes are acceptable.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • No OR.
  • Yes they're acceptable sorry Sturm for annoying you with the Google Books URL. But because I couldn't find anything else in this nomination and MOS says it should be included then I thought every byte is necessary especially in a small article like this because I want that sweet 30 GANs barnstar. And thank you for nominating every day at least a GAN. Because most GANs are already claimed by someone else due to the drive which is really annoying as hell. I think I will let it pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply