Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Claim. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Body and lead

  • Can we expand the lead just a little bit like where she did her trails and operating?
    • I don't know where she did her trials
  • the earlier unprotected cruiser Milan I'd think we better can add French here because I believe some people can be confused to Milan and think she was an Italian ship (because Milan is in Italy)?
    • Is that really necessary? We're talking about French cruisers, isn't the context clear?
  • The unprotected cruiser Milan was Same as above.
  • Link ardent supporter.
    • To what?
  • Is there no link or so?
  • To "ardent supporter"? No, that doesn't have any specific meaning beyond what the words themselves mean
  • No link for some of the guns?
    • We don't have an article for them
  • which was kept in commission for only four months per year If this commission lasted only four months a year what happened with her in the rest of the year?
    • They were decommissioned, but I don't know when they entered and left service
  • By January 1901, Coëtlogon and both of her sister ships --> "By January 1901, she and both of her sister ships"
    • Done
  • about 2,000 long tons (2,032 t) displacement Normal or full load same in the infobox.
    • Conway's doesn't say, unfortunately

Infobox

  • The tons don't match with the body.
    • Yeah they do - you're looking at the wrong number in the body - check the second paragraph

Images

  • "File:Forbin-Poyet.jpg" is there a tag which states it's in the public domain over the whole world?
    • I'm not sure what you're asking; almost all countries use some form of year PMA to determine copyright, so all of them that are 100 years or less are fine per the template. But I've added a US tag as well
  • Also just a question here is, do the NHHC's tags only speak for the US's domain?
    • Yes

Sources

  • Barry's OCLC doesn't say Washington D.C. but only Washington however this can be confused with the state Washington. Do you know a source or so which states it's made in D.C.? Same with Dorn, E. J. & Drake, J. C.
    • If you look at the source itself, yes, it says D.C.
  • Both Brassey's 1895s should have their letters like the citations say.
    • Done
  • All Brasseys have the same OCLC?
    • Yes, since it's a periodical
  • Gardiner's link uses the location: New York instead of London?
    • London is correct for the first edition that I'm using - this is the entry you're looking for
  • Are months really needed here? Except maybe both Brassey's 1895s should have a month or a letter to separate them.
    • Yes, those are monthly periodicals so the month is required. Brassey's was an annual; there's no month

That's it from me I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@CPA-5: - anything left to address? Parsecboy (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey Nate sorry for letting you wait for some time. I lost the ambition of Wikipedia and hadn't really time to reply (I had just started again with work and school —exams are coming too–. After a quick review, I think we should add years if possible in the image "File:French_cruiser_Coëtlogon_NH_66063.jpg" before I could pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @CPA-5: - no problem, things do come up. I don't have any years to add to the photos, unfortunately - I could say "date unknown", but I don't know if that really adds any information of value. Parsecboy (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply