Talk:French battleship Vergniaud

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review
Good articleFrench battleship Vergniaud has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFrench battleship Vergniaud is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 25, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox edit

  • No issues

Lead edit

  • No issues

Design and description edit

  • No issues

Career edit

  • Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
    • The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Legacy edit

  • Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection

Notes edit

  • No issues

Bibliography edit

  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 00:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply