Talk:French battleship Justice

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Parsecboy in topic Photo
Good articleFrench battleship Justice has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFrench battleship Justice is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 18, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 25, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
June 18, 2023WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 31, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a fire on the French battleship Justice nearly caused an explosion similar to one that had destroyed one of her sisterships?
Current status: Good article

Assessment edit

B-class. The article stated there were 10 guns in the 194 mm battery, but the infobox read 18. I changed this to 10, since the line drawing seems to show only 10 secondary guns. All 4 Liberté's have this typo; I will let you fix the other 3. I also added (7.6 in) because I have no clue as to what 194 mm means. The infobox does not list the tertiary armament. Djmaschek (talk) 03:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Justice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

review

I've made a few changes that I think improve the article, but you are free to revert them.[1] The article is fine.

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar: 
    b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:  
    b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:  
    c. no original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    no edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    pass!

Photo edit

Here. Parsecboy (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply