Talk:French aviso Savorgnan de Brazza

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French aviso Savorgnan de Brazza/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

• "They were protected by 3-millimetre (0.12 in) gun shields." - A bit picky, but maybe specify that the 3mm measurement is thickness?
  • Sure thing, hoss!
• "Between the mainmast and the aft funnel, space for reserved for a reconnaissance seaplane" - Something is off here
• "The ship's anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine capability" - Botched piped link?
  • <blush>Yep.</blush>
• There's a disambiguation needed tag
  • Not that I can find
• Is the author's name spelled Tennent or Tennant? Both are used.
• The Masson 1969 short citation is flagging a no target error. There's at least two ways to fix this: use a CITEREF tag in the long citation to target Mason 1969 there, or to change the inline short citation to Le Masson 1969. Your choice as to which one of those is better
  • One more reason to hate all of these varieties of this style of cite. Gimme my idiocratic and simple name and page # system, any day of the week.
• Hague's been published on convoy ships before, so I'd say his website passes WP:SPS
• O'Reilly and Tennent got publishing locations?
  • Only Tennent.

That's about all I've got to pick at for the GA standards. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

I think that's everything; thanks for catching these little nuggets of awesomeness.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)