This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Accessibility, a group of editors promoting better access for disabled or otherwise disadvantaged users. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.AccessibilityWikipedia:WikiProject AccessibilityTemplate:WikiProject AccessibilityAccessibility articles
Freedom Scientific is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm specifically concerned that there are apparently no sources that analyze the impact of Freedom Scientific and their products.
Specifically, their economic impact. Their hardware seems to be cheaper than competitors, such as Humanware, while their software is some of the more expensive on the market: Jaws being slightly more expensive than Window Eyes from GW Micro, to say nothing of free or OS-native alternatives such as Non Visual Desktop Access/NVDA, Microsoft Narrator or Apple's Voiceover.
I would expect there to be public sources on legal matters, such as the recent patent claims lawsuit between Freedom Scientific and GW Micro, or the dispute with the developers of System Access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.119.120 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply