Talk:Frederic Wakeman

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Frederic Wakeman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article should probably be moved to Frederic Wakeman, Jr. to distinguish him from his father.--Jiang 11:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Second the motion --Aboudaqn (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Additional Book edit

I've added a novel written under the name of "Evans Wakeman" to the list of publications.--Ekphrastically 14:10, 14 January 2007

Works by Wakeman edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

~~http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam031/95044122.pdf~~

~~http://books.google.com/books?id=TbpNjDlPSq0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=P8PZUK2uOtGC0QHSgoGwDQ&ved=0CFQQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q&f=false~~

~~http://books.google.com/books?id=vT5GrHv4VcMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CFcQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false~~

http://books.google.com/books?id=ORMNHQGDuBgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=GNLWtjV_MDwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=rDjoJNdZCuMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CEQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=NCgXTcXH-3MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CEsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=jYYYQYK6FAYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CF0Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=8nXLwSG2O8AC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+E.+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WM_ZULrbCOWA0AGZqIGQBg&ved=0CGIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=ORBmFSFcJKoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Frederic+Wakeman%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QNPZUIrrH4XB0AHeq4GAAw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

POsting unexplained links is a waste of your time! ch (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Major Publications edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The mention of titles in the section of the article discussing the arc of his interests does not obviate the need for a list with full citations. The list also includes items not mentioned in the text (a list with only items not mentioned in the text would make no sense). ch (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic