This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
After sentence "In 2019, allegations of plagiarism prompted the Free University of Berlin to review Giffey's 2010 dissertation." there is a reference to a list of famous plagiarism cases in Germany "Plagiatsaffäre - Alle Fälle von A-Z | Business And Science". Business And Science (in German). Retrieved 3 September 2019. This list belongs to the site of a ghost-writing agency (Ghostwriter-Agentur), offering i.a. to write academic dissertations at various levels, including PhD. The described plagiarism cases effectively serve as an argument to use the services of the agency ("Anstatt jedoch ein Plagiat einzureichen und die Gefahr der eben beschrieben Negativkonsequenzen auf sich zu nehmen, wäre der ehemalige Minister mit einem Ghostwriter für Rechtswissenschaften wohl deutlich besser gefahren." In my opinion, the reference is (inadvertently) promoting such dubious services through Wikipedia and should be therefore removed. Tangomilonga (talk) 09:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Your assertion seems fair. If you think it does not meet the criteria for a reliable source WP:SPS, then do it yourself - remove it from the article together with a short edit summary of why. You might want to leave a {{citation needed}} template in its place if no other reference is given. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
