Talk:Franky Perez

Latest comment: 6 years ago by NewYorkActuary in topic Unencyclopedic style

Addition of unsourced BLP material

edit

@Scotch80Music: You seem intent on edit warring over the addition of unsourced and promotional material to this biography of a living person. You have also ignored repeated requests to discuss the matter. Would you please do so now? NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Franky Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unencyclopedic style

edit

"It was no surprise to anyone when Lava/Atlantic Records snapped him up..."
Could someone correct instances such as this?--Adûnâi (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Adûnâi: I tried to do that a few months back (see the first section of this Talk page). I had been restoring the article to this version, but found myself in an edit war with someone who refused to discuss the matter. Would you support a second attempt at cleaning this article? NewYorkActuary (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Can you report that user?--Adûnâi (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Adûnâi: It might have been possible to report the episode at the administrative noticeboard that specialises in Edit Warring (WP:ANEW). And the fact that the other editor refused to engage in discussion would have made the case stronger. But that noticeboard usually doesn't involve itself in analyzing the disputed content and would likely have just advised us to start a Request for Comments on the issue. And this would have been especially true given that the dispute last year was between two editors only (making it impossible to declare that there was a consensus to not have the promotional material). But if there is a second editor with the same concerns, the chances of cleaning this article will be better. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)Reply