Talk:Frank Morgan (Home and Away)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank Morgan (Home and Away)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• No issues

Lead

• With a backstory consisting of an alcoholic mother and a criminal father; → Replace semicolon with comma
• He has spoke of dismay of the "hype" surrounding the role; as believed it to be misplaced. → Replace semicolon with comma

Creation and introduction

• No issues

Character development

• No issues

Storylines

• No issues

Reception

• No issues

In other media

• No issues

References

• No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria. There were two minor prose issues, but I went ahead and fixed them for you. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review this article. :)Rain the 1 21:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frank Morgan (Home and Away). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309164853/http://www.judynunn.com/bio_home_n_away.asp to http://www.judynunn.com/bio_home_n_away.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301113227/http://www.melbourneweeklyportphillip.com.au/news/local/news/news-features/alex-papps-hair-apparent-to-the-stage/1972674.aspx to http://www.melbourneweeklyportphillip.com.au/news/local/news/news-features/alex-papps-hair-apparent-to-the-stage/1972674.aspx
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65kYpy6Dy?url=http://www.novafm.com.au/audio_alex-papps-interview-city-homicide-and-a-bit-of-home-away_428 to http://www.novafm.com.au/audio_alex-papps-interview-city-homicide-and-a-bit-of-home-away_428

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)