This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article completely misses the varied points actually made in Frank Lyon. This case was not overturned by the TRA of 1986 and is still used in law school to illustrate problems with determining tax ownership, substance over form, and the equity verses debt connundrum. This article illustrates the point that tax law should not be left to laymen. This article should be completely overhauled or deleted. Lawtaxecon (talk) 02:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Later, this article can be reworked to delete the long quote from the syllabus. The fact summary can be reworked. There probably also needs to be a more specific brief description of the procedural history and the precise issues presented to and decided by the Court. Famspear (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
There is a great article written by Bernie Wolfman that I just read. It is riveting. I also have some correspondence between S.G. Erwin Griswold and Wolfman. Hammer of the year (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Dear Hammer of the year: Sounds like you have material! Famspear (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
