This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Frank Cameron Jackson is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I recently added some stuff and cleaned up. However, this article could really use some expanding, especially in Jackson's work on ethics and perception. - Jaymay 07:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a slightly misleading statement here:
The article talks about Jackson's creation of the "Mary's Room Thought Experiment". Jackson's original answer to the question was "Yes, she does learn something new, thus Physicalism is false." He later ceases to be an Epiphenomenalist and his answer is "No, she does not learn something new."
Perhaps the article should take into account his change of opinion. Refer to the "Mary's Room" article for clarification.
Agreed. It has been added. - Jaymay 07:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Would someone who can please snap a shot of him and upload it? Prospects of getting one by other methods don't look great; there are no photos on Flickr or similar sites for example. Richard001 (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
