Talk:Francoise Boufhal

Untitled

This page should not be deleted as it is 100% the correct information for Francoise Boufhal.

Take a minute and read WP:BIO - even if it is correct, you need to meet a certain level of notability to get an article on someone. Do you have some secondary sources (interviews/articles on her with newspapers/magazines/etc.) that you can link to in the article? --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes i have all the sources and articles to prove this, but i cannot work out how to put them on the page. Is there any way i can put them in here and you can put them on the page?Foubalo88 (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

I have put the references in now. how do i get rid of the bit of red writing at the bottom pleaseFoubalo88 (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I've fixed it for you by adding the required {{Reflist}} tag. Thanks for all the work on this. However, lots of the references you have given don't appear to be reliable sources. In summary, mainstream media such as newspapers, magazines etc are necessary. Lots of the websites you have included make the grade, unfortunately. Please read the guidelines for reliable sources and our verifiability policy for what we require for sourcing and in order to prove her notability --Slp1 (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Im sorry but how can the link to Francoise being nuts next top model on the nuts WEBSITE, with 'nuts next top model' written above her pictures not be a reliable source? i think you're mistaken there...Foubalo88 (talk) 13:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry that I didn't explain myself clearly enough. We need reliable sources to show that Boufhal is notable enough to have an article here on WP. See WP:BIO for more details. At the moment, it is not clear to me that she truly meets the criteria, since we need independent, mainstream sources to show this. The Nuts website (and the bulk of the other refs given) are not adequate, since anybody can set up a website and put whatever information they like on them. The question is whether anybody cares who the Nuts website pronounces to be the next top model. Many of the sources are also clearly attempting to promote Boufhal, and you will understand that there is likely to be some concern that this article is part of just such a promotional campaign. I don't mind giving this a bit more time, but more reliable sources would help prove that she really justifies an article here.--Slp1 (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I dont understand how i prove what is written is the truth anymore, other than if you google her yourself and see for yourself. Models like Katie Green and Keeley Hazel have articles on here, and they are no different to Boufhal. Delete this entry then if you feel necessary. Theres no more i can do as i dont understand what more you want for it to be reliable, even though its all over the internet. Cheers.Foubalo88 (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

To put this simply Slp1, I think you do not know of Nuts magazine. They are Britain's second best selling monthly, and ultimately fit WP:RS perfectly. Foubalo88, thank you for your contribution, now kindly find someone signed up to this hellhole to remove all the unreliable ref flags in this article. 217.39.8.130 (talk) 23:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)