Talk:Francisco Coimbre/Archive 1
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Noble Story in topic GA Review
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
GA Review
I'm reviewing the article now, and I'll be posting my review shortly. Noble Story (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Here's my review for the article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- The article is not up to GA-quality in this respect. There are numerous mistakes in grammar and prose (most notably using "on" instead of "in"). It seems to be written by a non-native English speaker (no offense to the editors, but I'm being blunt). The writing has to be improved before it can be promoted.
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- This is another aspect in which the article fails. There are many statements that are unsourced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Overall: Pass or Fail:
- Usually I put an article on hold and try to help the nominator in correcting the article, but I think the edits are too large here to be done in a short amount of time. Try going back and correcting the prose, and adding citations to statements that need them.
Noble Story (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)