Prehistoric tools section removed edit

I removed this section:

Archaeological recovery of Franciscan chert prehistoric tools from Native American sites in the western USA acknowledges the use of Franciscan material as a diagnostic indicator of rock source and thus the presumption of ancient trading patterns among tribes. For example finds of Franciscan chert in Central California suggest extensive trade between tribes of the San Francisco Bay Area with Chumash peoples.[1]

While it is certainly possible that there was "extensive trade between tribes of the San Francisco Bay Area with Chumash peoples", this is not supported by the reference -- [1] -- which says nothing of trade. San Luis Obispo County has abundant outcrops of Franciscan rocks, including the Morro Bay area, the subject of the reference. Anyone feel free to put this paragraph back if there is a better reference, i.e. one that specifically traces that particular chert to the San Francisco Bay Area. (The first sentence of the paragraph may indeed be true; we just need a different example.) Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 04:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oldest ages in JKf are circa 170 Ma (certain high grade metamorphic blocks). Most is Cretaceous (145-65 Ma) but the King Range terrane on Mendecino coast is as young as Miocene. However, the Marin Headlands terrane contains oceanic cherts as old as about 200 Ma. Don't have time edit now, maybe over Xmas. Geodoc (talk) 03:24, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ C.M. Hogan, 2008

Controversies related to "defining the architectural units of Franciscan Complex" edit

Should this be added to the article as a sub section under Description Meghomita (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

yes good idea Christierowe (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Controversies related to "defining the age problems in Franciscan" edit

Should this be added as a subsection under Geological History Meghomita (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

yes good idea Christierowe (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Title of article should be Franciscan Complex edit

The "assemblage" is not modern stratigraphic nomenclature Christierowe (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Trying to update the Description and Geological History Section edit

Trying to update the Description and Geological History section with more updated references from journal articles. Will add some new pictures to highlight the rock types and outcrops of the Franciscan. The lead section and the information box will also be updated to include the above mentioned changes Meghomita (talk) 19:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The new updated version of the Description and Geological History section has been added. Major inclusions are more updated references from books and journal articles. Pictures (courtesy of AGU, Callan Bentley, and Christie Rowe) are added to the article to highlight the rock types and outcrop features and structures of the Franciscan. Minor changes to the lead section and information box include a better summary description of Franciscan and the addition of greywackes and serpentinites in the rock description. DOI, ISBN, ISSN, and other external links are added to the Reference list section to improve accessibility to the article. Meghomita (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply