Talk:Fourth Era of Northern Domination

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Southeast Asia / Medieval / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Vietnam High‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

This article may have been written in strong sense of pro-Vietnamese independence from Chinese domination. It should be revised to remove emotional tone and add balanced point of view. Tttrung 14:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article is pretty lame...162.83.204.67 05:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The attitudes to history are just created by today's government and people, and it's obviously not objective. Suppose if south part of Vietnam get independent and become a new nation called Sitnam hundreds of years later, Sitnam would be likely to claim that Vietnam suppressed them, the same to the way Vietnam claims China suppressed them. -Zangqiangren (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC) But cannot this be reasonable? Historic documents pointing to key dates, names and places of key rebellions, not to mention relics dedicated to key figures during the period suggest one side is deluded (e.g Vietnam)? Rebellions and war would not exist without supression or dictatorship. Of course political adversaries think differently but to assume there's no legitimacy is an insult. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.168.8 (talkc) 12:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Who's the idiot who used "Nanyue", an unrelated country, in this article? --79.67.193.118 (talk) 02:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Basically, Viet and Han are the same people of the Asian ethnicity with common believes, such as, religions, traditions, customs, with similar language and the same surnames and might of have the same ancestors. But with different views of running the government, foolish Asian for thousands of years killed each other off for dominance like two brothers from one womb. The stronger one picking on the weaker one; forcing rebellion. When the weaker one wins, the stronger one gets humiliated and starts spreading rumors and tries to regain control of the weaker one so that the stronger one can be "great" if not the "favored one". Hence the saying "Two tigers cannot share one jungle", "Two brothers cannot share one wife." Histories agree with this notion. For example, North Korea and South Korea, North Vietnam and South Vietnam, West Germany and East Germany, Khmer Rouge, United State and Britain, The American Civil War and so on. When there is suppression or dictatorship there is rebellion. War will follow.

Thanks for share your naive vision of the world with us. --Hoygan!! (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

No, stop claiming common ancestry! Austronesian people were pushed back to today's situation. --94.217.102.91 (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

no source edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

only one source is cited, and it's really biased; no historical nor archaeological evidence to support those claims. Things like "Forbidden City was built in Vietnamese style" has no evidence at all, I only once saw this claim on Youtube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.171.158.154 (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply