Talk:Fournier gangrene
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fournier gangrene.
|
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Article title edit
The default article title should be Fournier's gangrene (and not a redirect from there) as that's how it's commonly met in literature. Fournier's gangrene (489) vs. Fournier gangrene (120). ktr (talk) 10:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- From PubMed "Fournier's gangrene"=25 "Fournier gangrene"=18 so not a lot in it. However there is a move to not possessively name eponymous disorders (hence Dr Parkinson did not have the neurological disorder named for him, hence it is not his disease - Parkinson's disease would be an illness he had). I personally dislike this political correctness, diseases have traditionally be so named with the "'s", still see List of eponymous diseases#Punctuation, but I agree most of teh articles still seem to be named with the "'s". Probably not worth the swtich in names unless a clear opinion to do so by several editors. David Ruben Talk 00:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
No picture? edit
There's no picture for Fournier gangrene, so could somebody add one? --68.103.31.159 (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Well, there is one photo now and it's seriously disturbing. I can't even distinguish body parts. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 01:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah... It should be hidden with a warning about how graphic it is and only show when clicked. Captain Skank (talk) 14:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I really wouldn't call it full recovery... It looks more like post-surgical debridement and that looks more like a foley insertion than an ileostomy, since ileostomies are not inserted, and I'm not sure why it would be relevant as the anatomy is not that close. --Javajoe57 (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fournier gangrene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007042739/http://media.haymarketmedia.com/Documents/2/fournier1107_1568.pdf to http://media.haymarketmedia.com/Documents/2/fournier1107_1568.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I request to remove this images are disturbing edit
Remove this disturbing image please 84.64.243.223 (talk) 00:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)