Talk:Four Rooms

Missing ingredient in this article

Someone willing to take a stab at the critical reception? This movie was a notorious bomb, as every review will read, although the latter two parts survived better than the first two. --Bobak 00:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed false trivia

Removed: " In Tarantino's part "The Man from Hollywood", Tarantino's character asks Tim Roth's Character "What was I talking about?" in which Roth's character answers. In Reservoir Dogs Tarantino's character asks the same question in which Roth's character answers."

In Reservoir Dogs Tarantino's character asks "What the fuck was I talking about?" and it was Steve Buscemi's (Mr. Pink) character who answered. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.91.20.219 (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 01:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Budget/gross

Hi there,

I've just checked and found that there is a mistake. In the info box it says the budget was $200, which apparently is extremely low. At the bottom it said the budget was $4 million. But given the link referring to it it says that the film grossed $4 million. This is a difference. I'm checking on the actual budget, though.--Kojozone (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

However, all sources state a budget of $4 million.--Kojozone (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

References

404

Actually, Ted visited room 409, not 404. It is clear because of girl in room 309. She dialed 409 and speak with mad man with gun.

(sorry bad English)

EmbargEr (talk) 17:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Cult Following

This film has definitely accrued a cult following over the years

http://fictionfield.blogspot.com/2011/10/four-rooms-loathed-by-critics-loved-by.html

http://mubi.com/films/four-rooms

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113101/reviews

(72.219.42.115 (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC))

None of those would be acceptable as reliable sources. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 18:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)