Talk:Fossicking

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Articles for Deletion debate edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 00:51, 17 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

And I'm glad it is still here. I found the term in a UK archaeological context. David Spector (talk) 16:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Fossicking is NOT prospecting. edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In Australia, New Zealand and Cornwall, fossicking is prospecting, especially when carried out as a recreational activity.

Legally this is utterly wrong, and bad information that could get someone in a wealth of trouble. Under the Acts Interpretation Act we are instructed to take the natural and ordinary meaning of words. In the Mining Act 1992 it states Mining and Prospecting as a section and Fossicking as a separate section. Within the act fossicking is ALWAYS treated differently to prospecting. Fossicking is legal under section 12. Mining and prospecting comes with a litany of other regulations involved. Interestingly I cannot find a legal definition of fossicking IN the act itself which brought me here only to find how off base this article (like most content on Wikipedia) is from reality. 121.210.33.50 (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic