Talk:Fort Lytton National Park

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fort Lytton National Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

massive changes without discussion? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User:MightDo, could please provide some overview of and rationale for the fairly massive changes you have made to this article? While there may be good reasons for what you have done, we are discussing an article with over 10 years of history contributed to by many other users, and I think some prior discussion of such massive changes are required. I note that Fort Lytton (which previously redirected here) has also been created, but it too appears to be a new article and does not comprise material that was formerly in this article. Thanks Kerry (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic