Talk:Fort Campbell

Chinook Helicopters

Do You Have CH-47 Chinooks At Ft Campbell (----)

Yes. 66.222.43.75 19:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

4USC115

Does anybody know the origin of and context regarding 4USC115? Why was Fort Campbell singled out while other locations were not? The text is as follows:

TITLE 4--FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES CHAPTER 4--THE STATES

Sec. 115. Limitation on State authority to tax compensation paid to individuals performing services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

Pay and compensation paid to an individual for personal services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, shall be subject to taxation by the State or any political subdivision thereof of which such employee is a resident.

JonathanFreed 20:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 12:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Mikel Crime

On the Fort Campbell page, Mikel is stated to have had been charged with 32 counts of attempted murder. On the Mikel page, he is stated to have been charged with 42 counts of attempted murder. Someone should find out the correct number and correct the article that is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.174.183 (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Propriety and Relevance of Section About Crime

Just speaking as one person who served in the 101st in Vietnam, what is the importance of a rather large section on the fact that a few crimes have transpired there? After all, the proud history of the 101st in Vietnam is skimmed over in a few brief sentences, but the reader is treated to a far longer section on some crimes. This looks like an attempt to suggest that the fort is somehow linked, in some way, to criminality. There was a murder recently in a medical lab at Harvard, but does that suggest some tarnish upon the reputation of Harvard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.153.18 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

That is a very good question. Perhaps we could condense that section into the rest of the article. - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. (I tend to dislike lone subsections; they usually seem to be a symptom of unbalanced coverage.) --GenericBob (talk) 08:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't delete relevant sourced content merely because it's negative information.
I agree that the article currently lacks balance. However, the problem isn't the presence of the information about a couple of criminal incidents. Lots of articles about cities, military bases, etc., include information about crimes and other bad stuff that happened there once. Rather, the article lacks balance because of the relative absence of other content about the base's history, the missions of its units, etc. What happened at Fort Campbell between 1972 and the "current operations" there?
If someone would expand the History section of the article, then the two criminal incidents would not look nearly so prominent. For example, could the article say something about the roles of the 101st Airborne Division (United States) and Fort Campbell during the 36 years from 1972 to 2008? --Orlady (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, don't remove information, add information to balance the article out. Binksternet (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Obamabucks

In the spring of 2007, the largest KFC in the world opened on Fort Campbell, Kentucky. This project will construct a 165,000 square expansion to the existing 107,400 square shopping center costing over 100,000 Obamabucks. The end position will be 164,000 square sales area, 18,800 square food court with 458 seats, expansion of both food concepts and KFC concession operations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.98.237.232 (talk) 21:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fort Campbell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080619234142/http://www.history.army.mil:80/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/div/173abbde.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/div/173abbde.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Campbell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205054345/http://www.campbell.army.mil/ftchistory.htm to http://www.campbell.army.mil/ftchistory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)