 | A fact from Fort Belan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fort Belan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111017174257/http://www.fortbelan.co.uk/index.php?id=27 to http://www.fortbelan.co.uk/index.php?id=27
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
COI violation
editTurns out an [i made] on this page relating to a fort Grandpa bought is a "COI violation". I did not know at the time what one is. What do i do now? 56independent/notacoworcatTalk 17:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56independent (talk • contribs)
- @56independent: I, personally, don't think you need to do anything other than reading, if you haven't, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the disclosure parts in particular. Grandfather owning something feels like you can make factual edits with a note in the edit summary but there are options if you're more cautious.
- As for the edit in question, I think it's useful and I style edited it some so that should be good too. Happy editing. Skynxnex (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)