Needs more on Description edit

Lots of intricate detail (I think way too much) on taxonomy and synonyms (of little interest to the majority of readers), very little information on basic size, morphology, distribution. Assessed as high Start quality now; a more balanced article is needed to attain C or above. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply