Talk:Forest of Andred
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Richard New Forest in topic Proposed merge
Proposed merge edit
Almost the whole of the current content of this article is in Weald. There is not enough material to justify its own article – is there ever going to be? They are really another name for the same thing. I suggest that "Andredswald" and "Forest of Andred" are included as alternative headwords in the first para of Weald, and the history section of that article is updated to include anything not already there. --Richard New Forest (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I do agree. I stumbled on this page categorised under Hills of Surrey, which is of limited relevance. These names are already covered in the history section of Weald. --Charles (talk) 09:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- No negative comments for two weeks, so proposal implemented. This discussion copied to Talk:Weald. --Richard New Forest (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)