Talk:Foreign Emoluments Clause
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Rename article edit
This article should be renamed "Foreign Emoluments Clause" as that name would better fit its common description since President Trump took office. Nobody is currently concerned about titles of nobility, since 2017, if not earlier, the clause has usually been referred to as the "Emoluments Clause." Since there are two clauses in the Constitution referring to emoluments, it would be better to indicate that this clause is about foreign emoluments. SMP0328. (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize edit
When Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize, there being a debate about the constitutionality of it. See, for example, Deseret News. The Office of Legal Counsel issued a response. Does this merit mention in the article? Gabbe (talk) 07:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)