Talk:For Your Eyes Only (short story collection)
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
For Your Eyes Only (short story collection) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
For Your Eyes Only (short story collection) is part of the Ian Fleming's James Bond novels and stories series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Copyedit
editI have made the following changes in my copy edit:
- Given the strong national ties between James Bond and Britain, I have standardised the article on British English spellings and date conventions.
- I have revised the names of all short stories to be in quotation marks, not italics, consistent with MOS:ITALICS and MOS:TITLE. I have also corrected other variances from MOS:ITALICS throughout.
- I have removed the "Publication History" section per the guidance in WP:MOS-NOVELS. That section of the MoS states that "you should briefly outline the publication history of the novel ONLY if there is interesting information to relate." There was no such information in this section, which was a bare recounting of the publication history of the book.
Improving the article
editAh, Wikipedia, paradise for people with a certain special psychology. I'd love to know why "a bow and arrow" is better than "a hunting bow". In the story, Bond says: "Put away your bow and arrow, Robina." Native speakers of English will know he's using childish language as a joke. IOW, "bow and arrow" is not suitable for an encyclopedia. There are other changes I'd like to make to improve the article, but if they're going to be reverted (again) there seems little point. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- There is no need to start a talk page thread with a personal attack on others. I willl discuss the substance of your point later. - SchroCat (talk) 10:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- It was not an attack: it was an observation based on experience. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, it was a rude, uncivil and unnecessary comment: an attack on editors. Please do not do it again. - SchroCat (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- It was not an attack: it was an observation based on experience. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
After finding and killing the Hildebrand Rarity, the Wavekrest sets sail for port... -- Educated speakers of English, native and otherwise, will recognize that as a hanging participle. I corrected it and improved the article. It has been reverted and the article has been unimproved. Wikipedia, as I said, is paradise for people with a certain special psychology. It is not paradise for educated speakers of English. Bond finds that Krest has been murdered—apparently by having the rare fish stuffed down his throat. Could someone explain what was "apparent" about the death of Milton Krest? Could someone explain how Fleming's description -- "To pick the small fish out of its formalin bath and slip it into Mr Krest's gaping mouth" -- gets turned into the crude, inaccurate and unencyclopedic "stuffed down his throat"? I don't expect so. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- You've been asked to remain civil. If you can't manage that then don't be surprised if people won't discuss things with you, or if you get a solid blast of base Anglo Saxon in return. - SchroCat (talk) 11:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on For Your Eyes Only (short story collection). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201092205/http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/847/847944p1.html to http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/847/847944p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
How to pronounce ‘Risico’
editCan someone add the correct IPA spelling for ‘Risico’. Given that it has not been used in film, only in the books, it would be nice to know how to correctly pronounce this word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.119.162 (talk) 06:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)