Talk:Foothill Boulevard (Southern California)

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

U.S. Streets Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads/U.S. Route 66 Mid‑importance

	U.S. Roads portal This article is within the scope of U.S. Route 66 task force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. Route 66 and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. Roads/U.S. Route 66Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/U.S. Route 66Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads/U.S. Route 66 task forceU.S. Route 66 articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Original route edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This information is mostly from old USGS topos.

Altadena Drive, Foothill Boulevard, Shamrock Avenue, Royal Oaks Drive, Highland Avenue, Huntington Drive, Foothill Boulevard, Amelia Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, San Dimas Avenue, Baseline Road, Foothill Boulevard

It appears that the original plan was to take it through Pasadena on Colorado Boulevard: [1][2]

The part from Sunland to Pasadena was originally Michigan Avenue. Later, when the boulevard was extended to Sylmar, it used Roxford Street and Foothill Boulevard, with a gap across the Arroyo Seco. --NE2 13:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I think a categorized redirect and merge from Foothill Boulevard Milestone (Mile 11) would make sense for readers. Any objection? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes objection:

The Milestone is a U.S. National Register of Historic Places, so no. If were not a National Register of Historic Place, then yes. But is it is.Telecine Guy (talk) 19:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose The milestone is also notable, and possibly more so, for being one of the only remnants of the Highway Commission of Los Angeles County in addition to marking Foothill Boulevard. Merging it into this article would dilute that history. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic