Talk:Foot guards

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Humphrey Tribble in topic Seniority of the Coldstream Regiment of Guards

Image copyright problem with Image:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg edit

The image Image:Coldstream-Guards-Cap-Badge.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Did Foot Guards 'sleep overnight' at the Bank of England in the early 1900's? edit

I read recently in novel "The Day the Robbed the Bank of England" that the Queen's Foot Guards marched to the Bank of England each night were they guarded the gold reserves. Is that true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.128.111 (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

If they were supposed to be guarding the gold, let’s hope they weren’t sleeping. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foot Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Foot Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Foot Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Foot Guards" capitalized? edit

Why is this article name capitalized? It's not a proper noun. Within the article itself, it's not capitalized. If there are no objections, I'll move this article to foot guards. --A D Monroe III(talk) 15:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Done. --A D Monroe III(talk) 22:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seniority of the Coldstream Regiment of Guards edit

I think the comments about the Coldstream need to be clarified. As I understand it, the Coldstream was formed before the first regiment of guards, the former name of the Grenadier guards. However, the first regiment of guards were in the service of the king earlier because the Coldstream was a Scottish regiment. (The timing relates to the act of union.) I’m not sure they were ever called the “second guards” because the regiment objected to that name, and the king received them as the “Coldstream Regiment of Guards”. This led to their motto Nulli Secundus.

The first regiment of guards holds position on the right flank of the line because of their official seniority. The other flank, the left, is regarded as another honoured position. (Formations in line of battle naturally wanted their most reliable soldiers protecting the flanks.) So, the position of the Coldstream has nothing to do with the motto and everything to do with not being second in line to the Grenadier Guards.

Finally, it might be worth noting that the Grenadier Guards was awarded that name (and their bearskins) after the Battle of Waterloo because they thought the French regiment attacking them was the Grenadiers of the Imperial Guard. It is now known that it wasn’t. Also possibly worth noting is that the “Coldstream Guards“ are not referred to by that name within the regiment. They are formally “the Coldstream regiment of guards“ and informally simply “the Coldstream“.

All of the above needs to be verified and properly cited, which is why I am writing it here rather than taking the time to dig up regimental histories and traditions. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 08:42, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

PS - I see the article uses the term Coldstream Guards in most cases. As I come across information, I will either add it to Talk or edit the article a bit at a time. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply