Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 August 2020 and 5 September 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mayhan1390.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

Other than the current pet-food related issues, here's two other recent cases about poisoined/bad food in china:

Fake eggs

Humain hair used to make soy sauce

I used the Internet Journal of Toxicology as it has the most sources, but both are widely reported elsewhere on the internet. Also, articles have a habit of disappearing/expiring from ispub.com, so it's good to keep a copy or to go to archive.org for them.

Not just food

edit

I suggest that this page be moved to Product safety in the People's Republic of China, as public interest in Chinese regulation has extended to nonfood items recently as well with the recent controversy re:Chinese-made toys. --Soultaco 18:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gluten

edit

This edit represents exports to *outside* of China. As such, I'm not sure it's relevant in this article. Badagnani 21:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

As there was considerable media reporting of alleged widespread contamination with melamine inside China (see Chinese protein export contamination), it seemed wothwhile to mention what the government had actually confirmed, and as it was used as one of the predicates for instituting domestic recall systems I thought it was relevant. Abby Kelleyite 22:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Was there melamine contamination of gluten-containing products within China? If not, it doesn't seem appropriate to this article, as it wouldn't be "in" China (and the foods were made with the contaminated gluten in the U.S.). Badagnani 22:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Several sections of the article relate to problems with the production of food in China. The contaminated products were produced in China, the only difference is they were then exported. I see no problem with this section being in the article, unless there is a more specific article elsewhere. --carelesshx talk 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

This, however, fails to answer the question "Was there melamine contamination of gluten-containing products within China?" Badagnani 22:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

As far as I am aware, there are only uncomfirmed media reports of the practice of melamine contamination of domestic food products in China. It would at least be useful to include the Xinhua references with regard to the positive steps taken to protect food safety, such as the food safety recall measures. Abby Kelleyite 22:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The cited Xinhua article clearly states: In May, China's quality control watchdog confirmed two domestic companies had exported melamine-contaminated wheat gluten and rice protein blamed for the deaths of dogs and cats in the United States. The stuff was contaminated when it was exported, hence the contamination occurred in China. Whether we believe the source (Chinese state news service) is a can of worms in itself and probably beyond the scope of this article. --carelesshx talk 22:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
On reflection, I find myself in agreement with the suggestion that as gluten exports are covered in a more specific article elsewhere, having a section heading in this article is superfluous. I wonder if it might be better to include a section giving a brief summary of some of the domestic food safety measures taken in 2007, as a counterpart to the food safety incidents? Some of these food safety measures are detailed in the references I included and I am sure there are more recent Xinhua articles on the topic. Of course, there may be many other good sources. As I am no expert on Chinese domestic policies, I would welcome it if someone more familiar with the actions taken do the drafting giving whatever level of mention they think might be appropriate to the role gluten export and other food incidents played in motivating any of them. On a purely personal level, I am made hopeful by the prospect that Chinese consumers may benefit from safety measures taken, in part, to address export safety concerns. Abby Kelleyite (talk) 17:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Let's leave the gluten section as is, then. Abby Kelleyite (talk) 11:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Unless there is a better reference than the July 10 Xinhua article. Abby Kelleyite (talk) 12:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tone

edit

The tone of this article, particularly the section headings, is sensationalist in tone, so I will retitle some of the headings to give the article a more balanced tone. --carelesshx talk 21:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

This seems reasonable. The section titles do seem to be written in a "newspaper headline-like" manner. Badagnani 21:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cooking oil scandal

edit

China goes organic after scandal of cooking oil from sewers. I think there is a need to address a separate article of this incident. Komitsuki (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Food safety in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Food safety in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VenusL (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by VenusL (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply