Talk:Foo Fighters (album)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Noleander in topic Comments

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • I can do this review, pending consent of nominator. --Noleander (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • word "frontman" - may need explanation for readers not familiar with the term.
  • "The album did receive minor criticism .." -> "The album received ..."
  • Foo Fighters navbox at bottom of article: is there a way to have it expanded (not collapsed) by default, so novice readers can see the whole thing without clicking?
  • "... but once Petty heard about the Foo Fighters, he instead stimulated Grohl to move on with this solo project." - "Stimulated" is not the right word. Maybe "encouraged"
  • "at Capitol's insistence photos of the entire lineup .." - what lineup? the producers? Or the band that Grohl assembled after the album was finished?

--Noleander (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fixed those (except the template, there's a way to do it but I don't know if it's required...). igordebraga 01:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

More comments edit

  • Very good. I am passing this. A couple of afterthoughts:
    • There is no "See also" section: are there no related articles that are not yet linked? If not, no need for such section.
    • There is no "references/bibliography" section that list books on the topic. Are there any books that focus the band? If not, no need for such section. --Noleander (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tick list edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

--Noleander (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply