Talk:Fog collection
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Fog Collector page were merged into Fog collection on 18 January 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Transwiki some content to Appropedia? edit
A lot of interesting content on this page is not yet sourced. If no sources are found, then rather than just deleting it, please transwiki it to Appropedia:Fog collection. (I would do this myself, but it might be premature, and I don't want to look like I'm stealing the content for my own project.) --Chriswaterguy talk 02:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Other Uses: Could something similar to this be used to replenish the Oglala Aquifer in the central plains states, USA? Possibly not a fog collector so much as something that, when conditions are right, "forces" a dew point on surrounding air. 2008-02-16 76.170.113.73 (talk) 04:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Effect on soil moisure edit
It would be interesting to know about possible adverse effects of large scale usage, such as the potential of increasing soil aridification, if the collected water is not used to restore/increase soil fertility. In other words, can collection decrease ambient air humidity and reduce the potential of soil rehumidification, or humidity preservation? 76.10.128.192 (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
condensation of fog edit
"the fog condense into droplets " fog consist of droplets, so fog can´t condense in any way. fog droplets settling down or combed out are more correct--141.30.161.90 (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
"Guy-wire" versus "guide wires" edit
On Wikipedia's "Fog collection" page... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fog_collection In the Main Heading: "Modern methods" (2)... The incorrect term "guide wires" appears... Which correct term should be "Guy-wire". SEE: WIKIPEDIA - "Guy-wire": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy-wire Hankdm (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Fog Collector edit
scope overlap/same topic (apparatus vs technique) merge to broader scope, older article (bonus: also has correct caps) Widefox; talk 12:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Fog Collector is not nearly as well written, although a few of the historical references could be moved here. TangoFett (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
