Talk:Focus of infection

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 94.196.232.188 in topic Focus of infection =/= focal infection theory

Problem with sources? edit

PrinceSulaiman, what is wrong with the sources? You just put problem tags here. This seems solid enough to me. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

On your purpose for this article, You have not provided any reliable source which it could be trusted. Please consider adding at least a reference from outside of the Wikipedia. --Prince Sulaiman (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
PrinceSulaiman Sorry, I just added the url and the page number of the dictionary I cited. Please see this source.
  • Last, ed. Miquel Porta ; assoc. ed. Sander Greenland, John M. (2008). A dictionary of epidemiology (5th ed. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0195314502. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |first1= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Does this meet your expectations? No doubt this is a strange and rarely used term. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Perfect, I'll remove the tag for now. Please make sure to improve on reference and also do not add Wikipedia's links on the Reference since you can use the Wiki-links instead. --Prince Sulaiman (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Focus of infection =/= focal infection theory edit

Focus of infection, which apparently is an epidemiological term about a geographic location from which epidemics might spread in populations, whereas focal infection theory deals with pathology within one host, not a population. It is about a local infection, e.g. tonsillitis causing, say, infective endocarditis in the same host. Pages could be merged because the terms are similar I suppose, but there is a difference in meaning here and if merged both concepts would need to be covered. 94.196.232.188 (talk) 16:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply