Talk:Flunixin

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2001:56A:71A5:3100:B198:B242:4B19:8503 in topic xkcd

xkcd

edit

This page was linked to by xkcd. Just a heads up. 24.6.107.29 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I wonder why 24.6.107.29 (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Woosh. TricksterWolf (talk) 00:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Comment of the year Pozaeo (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hint: read the proprietary names. -- SheeEttin (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't exist anymore, but it used to at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flunixin&diff=699809857&oldid=699636271 2001:56A:71A5:3100:B198:B242:4B19:8503 (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
First "citation needed" here: http://what-if.xkcd.com/141/
Guess that could be a new Popular Culture bit? 65.24.29.78 (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Trade names

edit

I removed the list of trade names because it was unreferenced and inconsistent with other sources. If anyone can find reliable sources for specific names, they can be added back in. ChemNerd (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Equine Medications source, which is listed in the references section but not used in any inline citations, lists "Banamine" and "Citation" as two of the common brand names. I don't have access to that particular book at the moment, so I can't see that page's full context. Perhaps the editor who originally added that content, Eventer, still has access to that book, and could provide some insight? Wrelwser43 (talk) 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
I went through and found more up-to-date sources and deleted the book. I can find some reliable sources for specific trade names, but if that is inconsistent then I think it is fine to leave it out. Banamine redirects to this page anyway, so anyone searching for it will end up where they need to be. Unfortunately, the formatting is screwed up and I'm not completely sure what I did or how to fix it…Eventer (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply