 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Lack of citations
editOK, just a note that I feel like any and all research on this subject is like I'm repeatedly hitting my head against a brick wall. Why? The concept is more or less "too new" to be written about in print. I am keeping a heads up for anything, but the subject is irritating due to its lack of citations. Zidel333 (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'm pretty fed up too :-) I reckon that the content is probably reasonably accurate but I most certainly can't source it despite many attempts. At the moment I am spending my time reverting attempts by vendors to add links to their site :-( My inclination is to merge it into Tea as its own section, probably just utilising the lead para and the image. Any thoughts? TerriersFan (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be all for merging this into Tea and keeping it as it's own little section. TerriersFan, that sounds like a good idea. :) Dru89 (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.153.226.85 (talk) 00:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
The information seems to be appropriately cited now after being edited in the past, thankfully. However, the mention of it being both a new and old concept is distracting and fruitless because there is no context to either claim. Establishing its history with details about its origin and timeline is still needed. Furthermore, it's worth including that it is tending in the tea and beverage world, making it a relevant and interesting topic, but not necessarily a new creation.SatyaHB (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Plagarism
edit[1] has plagarised this article. check it out —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.244.167.17 (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nope; NationMaster quite legitimately use Wikipedia content under the terms of the GFDL licence. TerriersFan (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)