This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The intro can be improved by not using the word "algae" (whatever that means), and substituting "diatoms" (which is correct). That makes sense of the blooms, because diatoms need silica for their frustules. The word algae is hopelessly compromised, and serves only to confuse. "Algal bloom" is therefore misleading. Next, I would suggest stressing the two cycles of deposition, as in Meyer 2003 p32/33. It's a pity we can't use his illustrations! In general, the later sections seem accurate, and it is really only the intro which makes me wince a bit. 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Macdonald-ross (talk)
