Talk:Florida's 13th congressional district
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editumm she hasn't won the primary yet.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.34.153.222 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC-5)
Election and Court Challenge
editUm, it's not even certain that the US House of Representives would accept the evenual ruling of the state court here. Congress has sole power to seat it's members and the loser in the state court case could appeal to them. Jon 19:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- There currently has been no decision. - Patricknoddy 5:24pm, January 12, 2007 (EST)
- Anyone know if they have made a decision yet? Brianopp 07:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
The map to the right is wrong, the 13th district includes Clearwater and Dunedin not counties south of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.64.200 (talk) 04:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florida's 13th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)