Talk:Florence Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 17 December 2012, it was proposed that this article be moved to Florence Airport. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. This move would require a demonstration of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which has not been attempted. --BDD (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)Reply

Florence Airport, Peretola → Florence Airport – This is the official name from the airport's website. Relisted. BDD (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Wind of freedom (talk) 00:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oppose - "Peretola" is used to avoid confusion for readers. There are other airports with similar names, including of the United States. --George Ho (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 7 June 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move with consensus after 1 relisting. To perform the move, I'm planning to re-purpose the disambiguation page as a redirect to the new "Florence Airport" from "Florence Airport, Peretola". (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Florence Airport", as this is the Florence Airport with the most airline service. Page view statistics show that this is by far the most viewed out of the four Florence Airports. SST flyer 10:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Music1201 ^talk 04:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I am agnostic about the proposal but the current title, Florence Airport, Peretola, has a pretty much useless disambiguator. Who would even know they are flying to Peretola on holiday? Move it somewhere. — AjaxSmack 20:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. Looks like a clear primary topic to me based on page views and Google search, but also given that this is an international airport and that the city Florence has priority over all other settlements of the same name. The obscure disambiguator currently given to this article is more likely to confuse readers rather than help them. PC78 (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support but not for reasons offered. If the name of the airport really was "Florence-Peretola Airport" as the Italian name suggests, then the article should stay even if it was the primary topic for "Florence Airport" (just as Narita International Airport shouldn't be moved to "Tokyo Airport", even if it's probably the primary topic for it.). However, I couldn't find any evidence of use of the old "Peretola" name on the website, sooooo I'm not even sure if Peretola is part of the name anymore, rendering the disambiguator outdated at best and wrong at worst. SnowFire (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florence Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20161027192051/http://albawings.com/web/ to http://albawings.com/web/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic