Talk:Flora of Uruguay

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flora of Uruguay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Uruguay

	Uruguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguayan flora, fauna and environment. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Welcome to the Talk:Flora of Uruguay

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please, take your time to review the article.Roxyuru (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Baptism of fire

Flora in Uruguay or Flora of Uruguay?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Either way. Both articles have been nominated for deletion. Too bad. I have made some new editions and added pictures, more text based on reliable sources and it looked like an article. Please, check it out again before deleting it Will you take the time, please? I have worked very hard on Flora in Uruguay and it is part of a project.

I know that some people find it easy to nominate an article for deletion, much easier than helping or contributing to an article, huh. This way, you are not welcoming new comers at all. Quite the opposite. Is this a Baptism of fire?

Peace, Roxyuru (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Flora of Uruguay

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Roxyuru. I have nominated Flora of Uruguay, an article you created, for deletion as it contains no content. While you did indicate the article was still under construction, articles cannot stand alone without any information on the subject whatsoever. I suggest creating a sandbox page in your own userspace instead (for example, User:Roxyuru/Flora of Uruguay), where you may work on building the article at a desired pace using reliable sources. Thanks for your consideration and happy editing -- I look forward to seeing the article reappear in due time. Auree ^★★ 06:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Auree ^★★ 06:01, 29 May 2013 (UTC) I am working on this page. I have added some content, a picture and sources. Please, check it out and be patient. Your contribution is welcome as well. (Roxyuru (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)).Reply

Add topic