Talk:Flora Fountain

Untitled

Added infobox.

informal Peer review

1. Refference No.1 being from a tourism promotion website not a source reliable enough for to verfy historical aspects.
2. When checked for history of flora fountain in books purpose of building and who did built it found some conflict of facts and need more carefull look into the actual historical facts
3. Refference No2 again used for historical aspects is a blog type report from an archtect by profession and not helpfull to verify historical facts
4. Refference No3 also from tourism promotion kinda web site not reliabale for historical fact cross check.
5. Reference 4 could not be accessed reached to an UNESCO dead link
6. Reference 5 To Maharashtra state gazeteer 1910 also reached to a dead link.Retrievable again from Govt of Maharashtra website and would be valuable for cross check of historical facts
7. Reference 6 also from tourist website not enough to give jsutice to historical facts
8. Reference 7 not valid refence since circular refenece to same wikipedia article
9. Reference 8 again leading to a travel guide
10. Refence 9 leads to a news website homepage not having any reference to flora fountain
11. Reference 10 is a some thing better than nothing reference to a book google book snippet but details in the book likely to remain unclear and not helpfull for verification of historical aspects
12. Reference 11 Nostalgia section could have been better , although reference to a google book preview is there still not sure of encyclopedic value or prominance vis a vis to an article of prominance.
13. Reference 12 Poetic expression is ok reference for a nostalgia section, but this can remain a subection to nostalgia section
14. Reference 13 & 14 again reference to a tourism commersial website
15. Reference 15,16,17 hardly of any encyclopedic value
16. If just to comment on references in totallity not at all any where near to expectation bar of english wikipedia .The articles present condition is good for shifting to wikivoyage ?
17. If I came here with expectation to build an article at Marathi wikipedia depending on references at en wikipedia then this is big wastage of my time let me admit ,I got no good reference for an encyclopedic article building up,and Hutatma Chowk has a separate article but with zero referencing,sorry to myself.
18. Some of the clutter in history section can be shifted to more relevant article Bombay Castle and need not be in this article.
19. I am quite doubtfull about encyclopedic value of Section Signage project
20. The official present name of the place is Hutatma Chowk if clutter from pages is removed and well presented we can merge article Flora Fountain in Hutatma Chowk article and redirect this page .And then page Hutatma Chowk can easilly be taken to GA level atleast.

Mahitgar (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Flora Sassoon

Hi. Some sources claim the fountain is named after Flora Sassoon. For example Forbs India and The Jewish Communities of India: Identity in a Colonial Era, p.18. Is it incorrect? Ben tetuan (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Flora Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.asiarooms.com/travel-guide/india/mumbai/sightseeing-in-mumbai/flora-fountain-mumbai-fountain-area.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flora Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/gazetteer/greater_bombay/places.html.
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208222134/http://mumbai.clickindia.com/travel/florafountain.html to http://mumbai.clickindia.com/travel/florafountain.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503112438/http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Flora_Fountain_-_History/id/1397046 to http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Flora_Fountain_-_History/id/1397046
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://mumbaireadyreckoner.blogspot.com/2009/02/heritage-walk-fountain.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)