Talk:Flexity Freedom

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flexity Freedom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: By country series Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the By country series task force.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Larger...

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article currently says:

Flexity Freedom vehicles differ from the Flexity Outlook vehicles used on the Toronto streetcar system in that they are larger and faster and use standard gauge rather than the streetcar system's unique broad gauge.

Its my recollection that the two kinds of vehicles only marginally differ in size. Geo Swan (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

They are slightly larger, yes. That sentence could perhaps be re-worded. Radagast (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edmonton vehicles?

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article contradicts itself around the Edmonton vehicles. It says that the maximum capacity of the vehicles is 254 riders and that the Edmonton vehicles can carry 275 riders.

The of the Edmonton vehicles here, shows a vehicle with seven modules, when the article says the vehicles have either three or five modules. I don't think an image is sufficient to rewrite the article. I think we need text to explicitly state Edmonton vehicles will have seven components. Geo Swan (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic