Talk:Flemish Cap
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flemish Cap article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
international water? edit
at first, no matter EEZ or international water, any natural resources retrieved from it should be taxed. we should implement the natural resources consumption tax.
For the sake of long run sustainability of natural resources, can canada take control of that area? At least collect the natural resources consumption tax on the internationl water on behalf of the united nations. Jackzhp 00:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
And why do you think that the United Nations should be the recipients of the proceeds of a "natural resource consumption tax?" I would like to know your political views as to why the United Nations. I'm all in favor of some sort of a tax burdon for removing any resources, natural or man-made, I don't care much whether it is or isn't nature. However, I'm not so sure how to tax, or if there was a tax, on how to tax the individuals or organizations behind the removal, and who would the tax proceeds go to? You trying to tackle a virtually impossible problem and your better off letting it go!!!
Why is it called the Flemish Cap? edit
The article doesn't say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.120.194 (talk) 04:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)