Talk:Flag of Nova Scotia/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bloom6132 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments

edit
  • Infobox and lead both look good.
  • Everything else is well-sourced.
  • "College of Arms ... were" → "College of Arms ... was"
  • Is this article using American ("ze") or British ("se") English?
  • In references, change "(subscription required)" to "|url-access=subscription".
  • That's all I could find. Great work.  
  • Sources are archived and reliable.
  • Article is stable and broad in its coverage.
  • Sources are reliable and there's no copyvio.
  • Images are also free-to-use.
@Some Dude From North Carolina: thanks very much for the review! I hope I've addressed your comments satisfactorily. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:19, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·