Talk:Flag of North Korea/GA1
Latest comment: 4 hours ago by Yue in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Yue (talk · contribs) 00:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Seefooddiet (talk · contribs) 09:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Hey! I'll take up this review. Nice work on the article, and thanks for taking up an important topic like this!
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Pending a spot check, will comment on other things first.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Some other comments below
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Feedback
edit- MOS:SANDWICH in a number of places
- I'm not sure, what are your thoughts on how we deal with Korean: 태극기; RR: Taegeukgi; MR: Taegŭkgi? Is it a proper noun? If so then no italics. If not, then possibly no caps and italics. Also should we use the diacritic? You seem to opt not to; is this because you have a sense there's a WP:COMMONNAME standard to not use the diacritic?
- Some refs that rely on links could use access dates; link rot rate increasing nowadays and these are somewhat useful.
I'll give the history/prose a thorough look soon. Prose is solid and no other obvious MOS issues on a quick glance. Overall solid work, will be a quick review.
- @Seefooddiet: Howdy there! Sorry, I've been away for a few days on vacation, but I'm back now. I'll get on your suggestions and concerns shortly. Thanks for taking up this review! Yue🌙 16:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)