Talk:Fiscal policy of the United States

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment edit

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 15:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

This U.S. Department of Treasury page says that the debt in 2005 was $8.1 trillion, not $319 billion. Am I not figuring something in, or is the article just incorrect? Ryan Salisbury 21:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)You are confusing the yearly deficit with the accumulated national debt.Reply

Tag edit

I put a tag on this as the referencing is very vague - a huge web article and no specific of what is being referenced - and also some possible OR. --Alfadog (talk) 17:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page needs focus edit

Will work on it. Soxwon (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Critique edit

Just a few notes:

  • Avoid referring to the U.S. as "we". It's pretty informal, and a lot of people reading the article may not necessarily be from the U.S.
  • You should refer to Roosevelt as "President Franklin Delano Roosevelt" or similar the first time, wikilinked of course, and then in any future cases simply as "Roosevelt". It's more consistent than switching between "FDR", "President Roosevelt", etc.
  • This sentence is awkward: "It affected some countries worse than others, and the US effects were detrimental." Perhaps "detrimental" isn't quite the right word...
  • "These numbers were up significantly from ten years ago when federal receipts averaged 3.80 percent of GNP while expenditures averaged 3.04 percent of GNP." Ten years ago from today? Or ten years ago then? If the former, why is it relavent in that place? If the latter, that should be clarified.
  • "Although the recovery and reform aspects of The New Deal proved to be effective for President Roosevelt, recovery was an issue that did not." This needs to be reworded. It sounds like "recovery was an issue that did not prove to be effective", which doesn't make sense.
  • "The act declared the continuing policy and responsibility of the federal government to use all reasonable means to promote maximum (not full) employment, production, and purchasing power." Again, this should be reworded.

I did not critique the modern section because it looks like you haven't been over a lot of it. Let me know if I'm incorrect in thinking that. I'm also going to go through the article and do some minor grammar cleanup/wikilinking. Pay attention to any citation needed tags that I add. Let me know if you need anything! If you respond here, please leave a talkback on my user talk page. Good work! GorillaWarfare talkcontribs 05:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

Good history and background on the budget and great depression.

There were a few instances of using personal pronouns (ie we) when mentioning the United States.

Modern fiscal policy section stops at 2009. Were you planning on ending there or continuing to today?

Also in that section, it may be wise to find a graph or chart depicting the deficit and budget from 2000 on, opposed to providing a paragraph of numbers. Otherwise its very informative and looks great.Mwbjmu620 (talk) 18:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiscal policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fiscal policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply